Under the ‘One District One Registration’ scheme, 172 documents: The wider industry impact

Under the ‘One District One Registration’ scheme, 172 documents: The wider industry impact

Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar : Maharashtra registration department on Monday suspended the in-charge sub-registrar and a junior clerk of the Soygaon sub-registrar office with immediate effect over alleged irregular document registrations, violations of fragmentation and registration laws, and conducting registrations on a holiday without permission.

The action was ordered by the Inspector General of Registration and Controller of Stamps after an inspection reportedly found multiple violations in registrations carried out between July 27 and Aug 7. 252 documents were accepted for registration during the period, of which 250 were registered, according to the inspection report. Under the ‘One District One Registration’ scheme, 172 documents from talukas outside Soygaon were registered. One of the most serious findings was that registrations were carried out at the office on Sunday, Aug 9, allegedly without permission.

Bhumre added that responsibility must also be fixed on senior officials if irregular registrations were allowed to take place Stay updated with the latest Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar news.

Reacting to the suspension, Bhumre said accountability should extend beyond the officers posted at the Soygaon office. “While it is necessary for the officer concerned to verify compliance of rules and laws while registering documents, the role of the higher officers must be examined if irregular documents are registered,” he said. The issue had recently come under scrutiny after Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar MP Sandipan Bhumre demanded action against officials involved in alleged bogus or irregular registrations and questioned why responsibility was not being fixed. Download the TOI App.

Violation of Registration Provisions Leads to Revenue Loss

The recent report highlights violations in the registration process involving 173 documents. Specifically, it cites breaches of section 18C of the Registration Act, 1908, and rule 44(e) of the Maharashtra Registration Rules, 1961. These infractions have resulted in a measurable loss of government revenue in one registration case.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *