However, the organisation alleged that the deputy commissioner subsequently issued detention

The emergence of CCTV footage has added a fresh dimension to the case

Times News Network

The controversy stems from the murder of Abdul Rahiman in Kuriyaal village on May 27, 2025, registered as Crime No. 54/2025 at Bantwal Rural police station. Mysuru Special Court on Sept 15 ruled that the invocation of KCOCA was contrary to rules and granted bail to Bharath Kumdelu, Abhin, Thejaksha, Shivaprasad and Ranjith, according to VHP. 54/2025 case, the recording of Kalladka Prabhakar Bhat’s statement is pending, and a witness notice has been issued to obtain it.

Dakshina Kannada SP Dr Arun K said that in the Bantwal Rural Police Station Crime No. After his statement is recorded, a charge sheet will be submitted to the Honorable Court, the SP said. police later implicated several Hindu outfit workers and invoked the Karnataka Control of Organised Crimes Act (KCOCA) While the initial FIR named five accused. However, the organisation alleged that the deputy commissioner subsequently issued detention orders under the Goonda Act, preventing their release.

Mangaluru : Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) on Friday condemned the state govt and police department for invoking the Goonda Act against Hindu activists and issuing an inquiry notice to senior RSS leader Dr Kalladka Prabhakar Bhat, alleging a politically motivated crackdown on Hindu organisations.

VHP also objected to a notice issued by Bantwal Rural police station to Bhat on Sept 22. Issued under provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Arms Act and KCOCA, the notice directed him to appear for questioning on Sept 26 in connection with the case. Alleging misuse of state machinery, Pumpwell claimed Hindu workers and leaders were being systematically targeted after the KCOCA charges failed to stand in court. He described the notice to Bhat as part of a conspiracy and warned of a ‘Kacheri Chalo’ protest outside the deputy commissioner’s office if the organisation’s demands, including withdrawal of the Goonda Act proceedings, were not met.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *