Seeking to quash the Centre’s May 22 notice, their plea said Delhi Gymkhana Club was not

The emergence of CCTV footage has added a fresh dimension to the case

New Delhi: Delhi High Court ’s Justice Prateek Jalan Wednesday recused himself from hearing a case over the Centre’s proceedings against Delhi Gymkhana Club for its eviction from the 27.3-acre premises on Safdarjung Road.

Khurana has claimed his plea is supported by more than 500 club members. They have also filed applications seeking a stay on the June 29 show-cause notice for eviction issued to the club’s management by an estate officer of L&DO. Another plea by the Gymkhana staff has said they are cooks, waiters, kitchen and housekeeping staff, gardeners and groundsmen, electricians and plumbers, lifeguards, security personnel etc. working in the club and sought the protection of their source of livelihood as well as fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution. Seeking to quash the Centre’s May 22 notice, their plea said Delhi Gymkhana Club was not a place of leisure for them but their place of work.

You Can Also Check: Gold Rate in Delhi | Silver Rate in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi | Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Petrol Price in Delhi | Diesel Price in Delhi | CNG Price in Delhi | LPG Price in Delhi Stay updated with the latest Delhi news.

“I will feel more comfortable if someone else heard it,” he said without elaborating. Gymkhana member Vijay Khurana and Delhi Gymkhana Club Ltd Staff Welfare Association have filed separate lawsuits against Land and Development Office (L&DO)’s May 22 order terminating the colonial-era club’s perpetual lease deed and asking it to return its land by June 5 on grounds of “strengthening and securing defence infrastructure”. The Centre had earlier said it would not take any coercive action in relation to the eviction for the time being.

“I am going to recuse from this matter. There are matters where one does not trust one’s own judgement,” Justice Jalan remarked. It had asserted that the suits are liable to be dismissed since third parties cannot restrain the enforcement of rights arising from the now-determined lease deed between the authorities and the club for the land parcel. Download the TOI App.

Justice Jalan directed that the lawsuit by Delhi Gymkhana Club Ltd Staff Welfare Association be listed before another bench on Friday.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *