Rameshkumar said the university began deducting Rs 150 per month as: The wider industry impact

Rameshkumar said the university began deducting Rs 150 per month as: The wider industry impact

COIMBATORE: The Bharathiar University Employees Union has alleged that the university illegally deducted money from temporary workers’ July salaries and warned that if similar deductions continue in August, it will launch legal proceedings and sustained protests.

In a statement, union general secretary M Rameshkumar said the university administration was attempting to recover an Employees’ State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) penalty, which the union claimed could be as high as Rs 75 lakh, by deducting amounts from workers’ wages. The union claimed that deductions of up to Rs 3,000 were made from some workers’ July wages, impacting employees earning about Rs 20,000 a month. It said around 450 temporary workers — including drivers, office assistants, sanitation workers and gardeners — have been working in the university for 20 to 30 years. Citing a response it received, the union claimed the university finance officer stated that past ESI worker contributions for the period from September 2019 to March 2025 would be recovered from wages in three instalments in July, August and September 2026. Rameshkumar said the university began deducting Rs 150 per month as ESI contribution from April, following the union’s petition to ESIC. The union alleged that Rameshkumar, a 19-year employee, was transferred from the university engineer’s office to the hostels office in a retaliatory move.

The union said the penalty was imposed after the university allegedly failed to deduct and remit ESI contributions for earlier periods as required. The union said it approached the chief minister’s grievance cell. It said representations were sent to the additional chief secretary (higher education), the university registrar reiterating its demands and warning of legal and protest action.

The union alleged that the finance officer’s plan to recover past contributions contradicted both the registrar’s assurance and the ESI Act. The union demanded cancellation of the proposed recovery and refund of the amount deducted in July.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *