Vigilance Department-3 of the Uttar Pradesh govt ordered a preliminary open inquiry

The emergence of CCTV footage has added a fresh dimension to the case

Lucknow : The Uttar Pradesh Vigilance Establishment has registered an FIR against SDM Vivek Rajput for allegedly acquiring assets and incurring expenditure disproportionate to his known sources of income during his tenure as SDM, Sirsaganj, Firozabad.

Following the inquiry, the state govt directed the registration of a criminal case through a confidential communication dated June 3, 2026. Acting on a complaint filed by Inspector Ravi Shankar Pandey of the Vigilance Establishment’s Agra Sector on Sept 2, 2026, an FIR was registered at the Vigilance police station. You Can Also Check: Gold Rate in Lucknow | Silver Rate in Lucknow | Bank Holidays in Lucknow | Public Holidays in Lucknow | Lucknow AQI | Weather in Lucknow | Petrol Price in Lucknow | Diesel Price in Lucknow | CNG Price in Lucknow | LPG Price in Lucknow Stay updated with the latest Lucknow news.

Download the TOI App.

The case was lodged under Sections 13(1)(b) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, as amended in 2018, following directions from the state govt after a vigilance inquiry found prima facie evidence of disproportionate assets. Vigilance Department-3 of the Uttar Pradesh govt ordered a preliminary open inquiry against Rajput, who is currently posted in Rae Bareli, through a confidential communication dated July 22, 2024, according to the FIR. The inquiry was conducted by the Vigilance Establishment, which submitted its final report to govt on March 5, 2026. The inquiry found that his total income from all known legitimate sources amounted to Rs 38.87 lakh. In contrast, his expenditure on the acquisition of assets and maintenance during the same period was calculated at Rs 1.09 crore. Based on these findings, the Vigilance Establishment assessed a discrepancy of Rs 70.92 lakh, which it termed expenditure and assets disproportionate to his known sources of income.

Investigators examined Rajput’s income and expenditure during the period under scrutiny while he was serving as a public servant.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *