Bill Clinton is pictured on the left, alongside an image of Metate Arch in Grand Staircase–Escalante National Monument near Escalante, Utah, on the right. Image credits: Wikimedia Commons
In September 1996, President Bill Clinton protected about 1.7 million acres of federal lands that have geologic features, dinosaur fossils, archaeological sites, and wildlife habitats in order to create the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument in southern Utah. President Clinton designated the national monument through the Antiquities Act of 1906 on September 18, entrusting the management of the site to the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) of the Department of the Interior . Initially, the designation covered about 1.7 million acres, but it was expanded by Congress to cover about 1.87 million acres. The then-president announced the designation on September 18, 1996, from the South Rim of the Grand Canyon in Arizona. Proclamation 6920 invoked the Antiquities Act, which explicitly authorises presidents to designate national monuments on federal lands to protect objects of historic or scientific significance. This proclamation reserved approximately 1.7 million acres of federal land in Utah and assigned management responsibility to the BLM. The monument’s boundaries did not remain fixed after 1996. On three occasions, Congress made adjustments, including through legislation in 1998 and 2009, increasing the federal acreage reserved within the monument by 170,000 acres. Consequently, the total area reached 1.87 million acres. In December 2017, President Donald Trump issued a proclamation removing around 861,974 acres from the monument. President Joe Biden then restored the monument to 1.87 million acres, its immediate size before the removal in 2017, through a proclamation in October 2021. More recently, on July 13, 2026, President Donald Trump issued another proclamation reducing the monument to approximately 181,541 acres, divided into the Canyons of the Escalante and Kaiparowits Horizon units.
The latest change therefore means that the monument’s present boundaries differ substantially from those restored in 2021. This move was made during a debate on the future of the region. Furthermore, it directed the Interior Secretary to prepare a management plan. This designation was subject to valid existing rights, and the proclamation particularly provided that existing livestock-grazing permits and uses would continue under applicable laws and regulations. Conservation organisations and paleontologists challenged the removal, arguing that while the Antiquities Act allows presidents to establish monuments, it does not grant them the reciprocal authority to reduce or dissolve them. Nevertheless, the issue regarding its boundary did not stop there.
The Los Angeles Times reported opposition from the Utah government to the designation, indicating that it was controversial. It involved a potential coal mining project. The Clinton administration’s stated aim included preventing development of significant coal reserves and protecting the region’s historic and scientific resources. Supporters of mining argued that development could provide economic benefits. However, conservationists were concerned with the outcomes for the landscape and its resources.