Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin had said ICE would not patrol polling sites but

Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin had said ICE would not patrol polling sites but

FBI agents will not be “monitoring” midterm polling booths

In a court filing late Wednesday in a lawsuit brought by the NAACP, the Justice Department said federal election monitors would observe polling places, take notes and would not act as law enforcement personnel, reported Reuters.

The US Department of Justice said FBI and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) personnel will not serve as monitors during the November midterm elections, amid concerns from civil rights groups that the Trump administration’s plans for federal election oversight could intimidate voters. They would also be prohibited from carrying firearms and have been trained not to interfere with voting or violate state and local rules, the filing said. Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin had said ICE would not patrol polling sites but could respond if there was a threat at a location or agents needed to serve a warrant.

Concerns over the possible deployment of federal law enforcement officers at polling sites had grown in the run-up to the midterms. Last month, a coalition of civil rights groups led by the NAACP sued the Trump administration, seeking to prevent ICE agents and other federal law enforcement personnel from being stationed at polling locations. The groups argued that the prospect of such a deployment could intimidate voters, particularly Black, Latino and Asian communities, naturalised citizens and members of mixed-status families. Even President Donald Trump declined to rule out sending ICE officers or National Guard personnel to polling locations. The Justice Department’s filing addresses the role of election monitors, while the broader legal challenges also contest the administration’s increased scrutiny of voter rolls. The groups argue that the presence, or threat of deployment, of federal officers could amount to voter intimidation and violate protections under federal voting-rights law.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *