Katy Perry’s proposed Gratitude Canyon youth camp in California has drawn opposition from more than 360 neighbours. (Photo: Instagram/Gratitude Canyon)
What has Katy Perry’s foundation said in response?
Pop superstar Katy Perry is facing growing opposition from residents in California’s Goleta Valley over plans to build a permanent youth camp and arts centre on a 110-acre property. More than 360 neighbours have signed a petition opposing the proposed development, citing concerns about wildfire safety, traffic, noise and the possibility of the site hosting events outside the summer camp season. Located at 183 Winchester Canyon Road, the proposed facility is intended to provide arts, music and nature-based programmes for underserved children. US election results: Flooding forces relocation of 21 polling sites in Florida US House election: Democrats need 3-seat gain to end Republican majority US Senate election: Can Democrats flip the Senate as Trump faces crucial test? More than 360 residents had signed an online petition against the proposal as of November 1, 2026, according to a report by local news outlet Noozhawk. Plans for the 110-acre property include eight cabins, accommodation for counsellors, a dining hall, a gymnasium, a swimming pool, tennis and pickleball courts, an amphitheatre and a recording studio. Only around 3% of the property would be occupied by built structures, with the remaining land retained as open landscape, orchards, habitat areas and outdoor spaces, according to the project website. Residents have raised concerns about wildfire risks, traffic and noise linked to Katy Perry’s proposed 110-acre youth camp. (Photo: Gratitude Canyon) Fire safety is another significant issue raised by residents. Another point of concern is the proposal to allow up to four special events a year, each with a maximum attendance of 400 people. The organisation says that the development would occupy only a small portion of the 110-acre site, leaving approximately 97% of the property as open landscape. In June 2026, the proposal was reviewed by the Santa Barbara County South Board of Architectural Review.
they argue that the proposed location is unsuitable for a facility of this scale While some have said they support Perry’s efforts to help young people. “We have zero problem with (Katy giving back to the community),” she told the publication. Deborah Holmes said she did not object to the idea of a nature camp but wanted greater clarity about the additional events and how they would be monitored. The foundation’s team has also said that fire protection measures and emergency planning are important components of the proposal. Jen Lilienstein, who organised the online petition, told Noozhawk that the canyon’s natural shape could amplify noise from activities at the proposed camp. “The canyon is a naturally occurring bowl,” she said, explaining that even sounds from the surrounding environment can be heard in the neighbourhood. “We are middle-class people who can’t afford to just pick up and move somewhere else because this happens,” she said. Acoustic modelling submitted by the project team indicated that sound levels at the nearest property boundary would remain below the county benchmark, according to Noozhawk. The project team has said the events would be limited and subject to management measures. Katy Perry’s Firework Foundation says Gratitude Canyon will offer underserved children access to arts, nature and outdoor activities. (Photo: Gratitude Canyon) The Firework Foundation has defended Gratitude Canyon as a project designed to benefit young people while preserving much of the property’s natural character. Another board member, Jerry Rocci, said he believed the project could have a relatively low impact on the surrounding community.
The project, called Gratitude Canyon, is being developed by Perry and her sister, Angela Lerche, through their nonprofit organisation, the Firework Foundation. However, residents living in nearby neighbourhoods believe the development could significantly change the character of their community. The proposed camp would include cabins, a swimming pool, an amphitheatre and a recording studio, while preserving most of the property as open landscape. (Photo: Gratitude Canyon) The proposed Gratitude Canyon development would provide a permanent home for Camp Firework, the youth sleepaway programme run by Perry’s foundation. The camp is intended to serve middle-school-aged children through activities focused on creativity, self-expression, arts and outdoor exploration. The development would also include outdoor recreation areas and other facilities for campers. The foundation’s broader aim is to expand the work of Camp Firework by creating a permanent facility in the Santa Barbara County region. The organisation has already hosted multiple youth camps, offering children from underserved communities opportunities to explore music, dance, hiking and other creative activities. Residents from nearby communities, including Winchester Commons and other neighbourhoods around Winchester Canyon, have raised objections to the proposed development. One of their main concerns is the possibility that the project could bring increased traffic and activity to an otherwise quiet residential area. Neighbours argue that a permanent facility with multiple amenities and the potential for off-season events could have a much wider impact than a conventional summer camp. Sandra McGreevy, one of the residents who spoke to Noozhawk, clarified that the opposition was not directed at Perry’s charitable work. Residents have also questioned why the application includes provisions for special events outside the regular camp season. The project’s proposed activities have become a central point of disagreement, with residents seeking assurances that the facility would operate primarily as a youth camp rather than become a venue for larger gatherings. Neighbours have pointed out that the area has limited road access, with one main street serving the surrounding community. They fear that a wildfire could create dangerous evacuation conditions if residents, campers, staff and visitors all needed to leave the area at the same time. The petitioners have also questioned whether the project’s fire safety assessment adequately accounts for the number of people who could be present during special events and other peak-attendance periods. Apart from fire safety, neighbours are concerned about the possibility of noise travelling across the canyon and disturbing nearby homes. Residents have described the surrounding landscape as a naturally enclosed area where sound can carry over considerable distances. Lilienstein added that residents were concerned about the long-term impact on their quality of life. The foundation’s project team has disputed the suggestion that the camp would create excessive noise. The camp would also have quiet hours. Residents have questioned how parking, traffic and noise would be managed during these gatherings. It has also maintained that the facility is not intended to operate as a commercial concert or wedding venue. On its project website, the foundation describes the proposed facility as a place offering underserved children opportunities in the arts, nature exploration and creative expression. The foundation has also argued that the proposal offers an alternative to more intensive forms of development that could otherwise be considered for the land. The project has received support from local youth organisations, including Girls Inc. of Greater Santa Barbara and the United Boys & Girls Club Santa Barbara. Both organisations have been associated with the foundation’s youth initiatives. Board members supported the revised architectural plans, although the meeting was not a final approval of the overall development. Board member Valerie Frosch praised the design, describing the proposed buildings as beautiful. However, the board also raised questions about aspects such as the entrance design and traffic flow, while making clear that the project still had several stages to complete before it could receive approval.
Residents believe the evacuation arrangements need closer scrutiny before the project can move forward, according to Noozhawk. The Gratitude Canyon team, meanwhile, says fire safety and vegetation management have been considered as part of the planning process. The project has involved consultation with the Santa Barbara County Fire Department, as well as Robert Lewin, a former Santa Barbara County emergency management director and former San Luis Obispo fire chief.
When will Katy Perry’s youth camp get approval?
Santa Barbara County planners have requested additional information from the project team, and the environmental impact report process has not yet begun, according to Noozhawk’s November 1 report. Because the project involves proposed changes to land-use rules, it will require further consideration by county officials. Gratitude Canyon remains in the early stages of the county’s review process. An environmental scoping hearing is expected early next year. The proposal will also have to undergo the required review under the California Environmental Quality Act, which examines potential environmental effects and opportunities to address them. For now, the proposed Gratitude Canyon development remains a point of contention between the Firework Foundation and neighbouring homeowners. residents want stronger assurances about its impact on their homes, safety and surroundings While Perry and her sister see it as an opportunity to create a lasting resource for underserved children. The debate is likely to continue as the project moves through the county’s planning and environmental review process. You use AI every day. Now get your AI Quotient. Take the AIQ test.
Public hearings before the County Planning Commission and, subsequently, the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors are part of the approval process.