HC refuses protection to contractor from DVAC action — Illegal sand mining

Madurai: Tamil Nadu police’s south zone secured convictions in 17 murder cases in Sept, with 50

Chennai: Madras high court on Wednesday refused to restrain the DVAC from taking any coercive action against a Class-I contractor of state water resources department, who challenged a 2024 communication sent by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to the Tamil Nadu DGP in connection with its probe into alleged ₹4,000 crore illegal sand mining.

The first bench of Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice G Arul Murugan ordered notices and asked the DVAC to respond to the plea in two weeks.

The petitioner, A Rajkumar, working partner of R S Constructions, a Class-I contractor of the Tamil Nadu Water Resources Department approached the court against a DVAC inquiry based on a 2024 communication issued by the ED in connection with an illegal sand mining investigation. He further stated that, in Dec 2025, the state govt described the June 2024 communication as ‘absolutely non-est’ and a ‘dead communication’ in proceedings concerning a subsequent ED plea seeking registration of FIRs. However, after the change of govt in May 2026, DVAC issued a notice to the petitioner on Sept 16 directing his appearance.

You Can Also Check: Gold Rate in Chennai | Silver Rate in Chennai | Bank Holidays in Chennai | Public Holidays in Chennai | Chennai AQI | Weather in Chennai | Petrol Price in Chennai | Diesel Price in Chennai | CNG Price in Chennai | LPG Price in Chennai Stay updated with the latest Chennai news.

The ED communication named his firm among four contractors and referred to statements of water resources department officials, a report by Terraqua UAV Solutions, data obtained from excavator manufacturers and a provisional attachment order, according to the petitioner. Rajkumar claimed that the communication did not attribute any specific act or omission to him or his firm and did not seek registration of an FIR. The notice did not specify an allegation or offence and stated that the firm was acquainted with the facts of an enquiry, he added. Download the TOI App.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *