“We are not selling parks,” he said, adding that alternative routes would be examined

“We are not selling parks,” he said, adding that alternative routes would be examined

Chief minister DK Shivakumar assessed impact of the drought on onion, chilli and sunflower crops in Bagalkot

He said BJP had also opposed the steel bridge proposed during the previous Congress govt and challenged the party to name major infrastructure projects it had initiated during its tenure. “I cannot use the kind of language used by BY Vijayendra, Union minister HD Kumaraswamy and opposition leader R Ashoka while sitting in the CM’s chair,” he said. On the issue of extending sanction to prosecute B Nagendra, who was forced to quit as planning and statistics minister, Kumaraswamyand BJP’s Gali Janardhan Reddy and MP Renukacharya for various alleged irregularities, he said the govt had not yet taken any decision on the issue. He said files relating to Nagendra, Reddy, Renukacharya and others had only now been received from the governor.

He hit back at BJP functionaries criticising the govt and urged them to exercise restraint in their statements. “Even if they do not respect me, they should at least respect the position given to me by the people and party.

He said the aim of the bill was to transfer land for the Namma Metro project, and the govt has no intention of taking over Lalbagh land for the proposed 16.5km tunnel road project.

He said it was also to respect public sentiment and accused BJP of opposing major infrastructure projects in Bengaluru. “There is no question of an U-turn,” Shivakumar said. “We are not selling parks,” he said, adding that alternative routes would be examined for the tunnel project.

Bengaluru: Chief minister DK Shivakumar Friday defended the withdrawal of the Karnataka Govt Parks (Preservation) Amendment Bill, insisting it wasn’t a U-turn as principal opposition BJP had claimed, and was only to facilitate a detailed discussion on the proposal in the legislature. “The bill was withdrawn only to facilitate a detailed discussion in the House.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *